Ideachess

Data	Giocatore	Messaggio
2014-10-03	Datr	Zuril: You may have noticed that some of the threads have much longer comments and an increase in the number of comments. On occasion it isn't possible to see the last comment without moving the whole page with the page slider, then moving the comments slider again. I have noticed that if you move the comments slider 1cm the text moves down 1cm, would it me possible to magnify the sliders effect so that 1 cm movement on the slider moves the text down 2cm, say, this would enable players to see more comments without having to move the page slider.
2014-09-23	Garykevinware	Fritz saw it almost instantly.
2014-09-23	Datr	Stockfish and Houdini failed to see that move.
2014-09-23	Garykevinware	Was it Stockfish that didn't see that 6 g4 or whatever move that was?
2014-09-22	Datr	Zuril: When I first joined the site you were using Stockfish and then switched to Houdini, sometimes I disagree with the site engine and prefer a different move, I then check the position with Stockfish and often find that it agrees with me. I think Stockfish seems to play a more human style of chess than Houdini. Perhaps it is time to switch back to Stockfish. Sometrhing to consider.
2014-09-12	Garykevinware	Nice rationalization. If I say that a problem 'can' be corrected, that means that it is capable of being corrected, which by Zuril's admission, it is.
2014-09-12	Datr	Final comment on this. When someone says "Sorry I can't see you tomorrow", it doesn't mean it is impossible for them to see you, it means they have other priorities and have made a decision not to see you. In the same way the problem can't be corrected doesn't mean it is impossible to correct it, it means Zuril has decided not to correct it.
2014-09-11	Garykevinware	"It would appear that your: m6127 "The solution needed to be changed; same thing." has been removed from the Wall." That's because it was never on the Wall. What is the difference between the 'text' and the 'solution'. In both cases, changes needed to be made to the solution. Two statements that have been proven true: "'Let's' evade the fact that you're wrong." "Therefore, you are wrong, but you will continue to refuse to admit it." A simple syllogism: Premise: A problem can be corrected. Statement: "It's easier to delete the problem rather than correct it because problems are stored in the database in a form adapted for the computer rather than to human reading and editing.: Conclusion: The problem could be corrected. Quod erat demonstratum.
2014-09-11	Datr	It would appear that your: m6127 "The solution needed to be changed; same thing." has been removed from the Wall.
2014-09-11	Datr	It isn't the same thing, there are the moves which are stored in a database in computer friendly format and there is the associated text, the text is easier to correct than the moves. m6127 had the correct moves stored in the computer friendly format but the associated text was wrong.
2014-09-11	Garykevinware	The problem 'could' have been corrected. What do you not understand about that sentence? I certainly don't understand this sentence, "I am no expert it seems to be more than you."
2014-09-11	Datr	Stick to what you know, correcting spelling and grammar because you obviously don't know much about software, I am no expert it seems to be more than you.
2014-09-11	Garykevinware	Precisely, it could have been corrected, like m6127.
2014-09-11	Datr	Precisely.
2014-09-10	Zuril	It's easier to delete the problem rather than correct it because problems are stored in the database in a form adapted for the computer rather than to human reading and editing

2014-09-10	Garykevinware	I doubt your facts about whether Zuril always deletes problems rather than correcting them, but the point is the problem was a sound mate in 3, that for some reason had a bizarre 'solution', and so it is capable of being corrected, like I said, whereas you said that it could not be corrected. Therefore, you are wrong, but you will continue to refuse to admit it.
2014-09-09	Datr	OK. In my opinion you are wrong, why, because on many occasions I have asked Zuril to Correct or Delete problems and on every occasion he has deleted them, not on one occasion has he corrected a problem. So I am assuming the same thing will apply this time. So why would I admit you are correct when based on historical evidence you are totally wrong.
2014-09-09	Garykevinware	Sure, you're evading. I said, "Of course it can be corrected; you change the solution to the correct one.", and you didn't admit that I was right, you just 'passed the buck' to Zuril.
2014-09-09	Datr	I am not evading anything, I am waiting for Zuril's response.
2014-09-09	Garykevinware	'Let's' evade the fact that you're wrong.
2014-09-09	Datr	Zuril will sort it out one way or another, lets wait and see how he does it.
2014-09-09	Garykevinware	Of course it can be corrected; you change the solution to the correct one.
2014-09-09	Datr	Because it can't be corrected.
2014-09-08	Garykevinware	Why do you want to delete what can be corrected?
2014-09-08	Datr	Zuril: When one translates a page to English the FEN gets corrupted, is it possible to stop this happening.
2014-09-08	Datr	Zuril: m78950 needs deleting.
2014-08-31	Zuril	N4pll: found and fixed. Thanks!
2014-08-31	N4pll	Zuril: User (menu) ----> Stats On Stats is the spelling mistake N4PLL
2014-08-31	Zuril	m53417 disabled. Thanks Datr.
2014-08-31	Zuril	N4pll: I see the correct word LATEST. In the main page after loggin in right?

Bacheca messaggi