Data | Giocatore | Messaggio | |
2016-06-24 | N4pll |
To Datr and Zuril: Maybe the last problem becomes a Mate in 4 NOT Mate in 3. N4PLL |
|
2016-06-24 | Datr |
Zuril: m38163 needs deleting. |
|
2016-05-12 | Datr |
Zuril: m81889 needs deleting. |
|
2016-05-02 | Dmedved | I guess the Alexandra Samaganova profile is a fake. Well it's a real enough profile, it just doesn't belong to the real Alexandra Samaganova. | |
2016-05-02 | Lordvhin | N4pll my komodo 9.42 is crushing in engine tournaments, that is why i am using komodo 9.3 and stockfish 7 ... | |
2016-04-29 | N4pll | Komodo 9.42 is better than Stockfish 7 by about 5 rating points. | |
2016-04-25 | N4pll |
The wall is for: 1. Checkmate problems that have 2 different but correct answers. It needs to be deleted. 2. Someone's Internet browser or Java is not working properly on ideachess.com 3. Tell everybody the latest and greatest chess engine that came out recently. 4. Zuril will give his updates like the cloud came out about 3 months ago. Otherwise use the forum; maybe Datr, GaryKevinware, and Zuril will give some input. N4PLL |
|
2016-04-21 | Lordvhin | hi, just wondering what is this wall for? | |
2016-03-17 | N4pll | OOPS N4PLL | |
2016-03-17 | N4pll |
I just added in the forum section on site feedback instead of using the wall. If you have list of improvements please type in the forum to see if it is the same as mine or a new one. N3PLL |
|
2016-03-11 | Datr |
Mel: OK; glad to help. I see your RD is now 145 and you are on the list, Ranked #53 |
|
2016-03-10 | MelGriffin |
Thank you Datr. I greatly appreciate your yor response. Regards, Mel Griffin |
|
2016-02-29 | N4pll |
Zuril: Checkmate number 44688 has 2 solutions. This one needs to be deleted. N4PLL |
|
2016-02-25 | Datr |
Your RD is currently 350, only players with an RD below 150 appear on the list. After you have attempted a number of problems, possibly 20 or so, your RD will drop below 150, you will then appear on the list. |
|
2016-02-25 | Datr | Your RD is currently 350, only players with and RD | |
2016-02-25 | MelGriffin |
I registered here back 2012 and I have just recently come back here after a long hiatus. My old ELO was 1779 and now it is 1995 yet I am not on the Rank List. Anyone out there have a clue as to why. Thanks for your time and patience...Love this site. Regards, Mel Griffin |
|
2016-02-13 | N4pll |
Zuril: 3 years ago *February 12, 2013" you showed the checkmates from mate in 1 to mate to mate in (10???). Could you update the checkmates again since we deleted 22 of them? Thank you for adding the cloud. N4PLL |
|
2016-02-09 | LeoChen | ei salve | |
2016-02-05 | Garykevinware | In chess compositions, it might be considered a flaw to have dual solutions, but it is a bigger flaw to have a correct answer marked as wrong. | |
2016-02-05 | Datr | There used to be more than on path to mate, on some mate problems, and I used to like it when there was, but the software was change to search for unique solutions only. I preferred the old system, it seem to provide more wealth to the solutions. | |
2016-02-04 | Garykevinware | The same would go for having 'tunnel vision', only seeing one path to mate, instead of multiple ones. | |
2016-02-04 | Garykevinware | My point is to fix it so that the inaccurate problems aren't put up in the first place. As I might have explained before, the Chess Life editor inaccurately labelled the preview problem for an article of mine as a mate in 3 instead of a mate in 2, because if you don't use Fritz in the Mate Search mode, it won't necessarily find the quickest mate, like the difference between a problem solver and an OTB player. | |
2016-02-04 | N4pll |
I agree with both of you Datr and Garykevinware. The 22 deleted mated problem are nothing compared to the other mated problems (Datr). However, I think we have too many linear (single lined) problems (Garykevinware). In other websites they use parenthesis showing other ways to solve a checkmate. N4PLL |
|
2016-02-04 | Datr | Zuril has already explained that it is far more difficult to fix than delete, I assume it simply isn't time or cost effective and there certainly isn't a shortage of other mate problems. | |
2016-02-03 | Garykevinware | Instead of just deleting these flawed problems, why don't you fix it so that there aren't any more flawed problems; specifically, mate problems in which acceptable solutions are deemed wrong. | |
2016-02-03 | Datr |
Zuril: m49314 is flawed and needs deleting. |
|
2016-01-30 | Zuril | Giadi's comments deleted! | |
2016-01-29 | Datr | Giadi | |
2016-01-29 | Datr |
Zuril: Gaidi's comments seem to have messed up the comments page, please could you sort it out. Thanks Datr |
|
2016-01-29 | Dmedved | Add comment . Don't actually write anything. Press save. Then add your rating, then repeat as many times as you like. | |